When a student violates the rules of the institution must punish him. In high school I observed that there are different types of students who violate the regulations
- Rebels who try to hide what they know but may, for them it is a game
- Those who live some rules as an injustice and want to express their disagreement.
- Those who can not do otherwise but are bothered by such a student house minor who smokes and has not allowed out to smoke then it will hide in the yard to smoke a cigarette because he can not quit. This case is particularly hard to manage because we are tempted to sympathize with them especially when we know that the student is undergoing a major period of stress (exams, personal problems).
course, we must punish them, but in some cases a long discussion is much more useful than punishment, because he understands the goal is prohibited and not as lively as it is an injustice.
The problem of managing penalties for me is that on one hand while the guards do not punish the same way, that is to say that some do leave prohibited (smoking, going out, ... ) so students no longer understand the limits. 
Another problem that arises at the level of sanctions is that some guards abused the sanctions, that is to say that when they do not like a student, they provoke, wait a replica to the sanction and are happy to forward (by amplifying and distorting the facts) with PBS, and the word of the student has not weight compared to that of a supervisor.
0 comments:
Post a Comment